Comparison and Review Component Frameworks Programming

Comparison and Review Component Frameworks Programming

Comparison and Review

Top: Computers: Programming: Component Frameworks: Comparison and Review

See Also:

- An assessment of COM, CORBA, and Java/RMI, by David Chappell.
- The discussion is organized as the following sections: approach, enterprise architecture, background, comparison, and conclusion. The comparison identifies the criteria for specification, object model, services, platform and tool support, and maturity. (O
- A comparison of COM and CORBA, by David Chappell.
- What exactly is the .NET platform and how does the .NET architecture measure up against J2EE? By Jim Farley, author of Java Distributed Computing and co-author of Java Enterprise in a Nutshell.
- The article discusses the Ovum report titled "Ovum Evaluates: Object Request Brokers". (Ron Condon / ComputerWorld)
- Feature-by-feature comparison of the differences between CORBA, DCOM, and Java/RMI, with a simple source code example reimplemented in each. By Gopalan Suresh Raj.
- Provides a comparison between MTS and Enterprise JavaBeans. The two models are compared in terms of transactions support, controlling complexity, portability, interoperability, language choice and administration. By Microsoft.
- Compares the same program, Klotski, written in Gtk, Qt and PyQT. Descriptions, code samples, tables, statistics, humor. [Open Source]
- Compares ActiveX controls against JavaBeans, by David Chappell.
- DCOM/CORBA Comparison.

MySQL - Cache Direct sec.